Epstein was most often described in public as a financial consultant who made his living “managing money for billionaires.” Even that vague description raises immediate questions. He was not a certified public accountant. He was not a tax attorney. He never held a Series 7 license or a Chartered Financial Analyst designation. He did not have a college degree. And yet, by his own representation and by the fees that can be traced through bank records and court filings, Epstein charged tens of millions of dollars annually for services that, on paper, appeared to overlap with work performed by entire teams at elite family offices. In an industry that is intensely credentialed and fiercely competitive, particularly at the highest levels of wealth management, Epstein’s rise makes little conventional sense.
To understand how implausible his trajectory was, it helps to start at the beginning. Jeffrey Epstein began his professional life as a high school math teacher at the Dalton School in Manhattan, despite lacking a college degree. In 1976, he was dismissed for what the school later described as poor performance. What followed would normally have ended most careers before they began, yet for Epstein it proved to be a stepping stone. Shortly after leaving Dalton, he landed a job at Bear Stearns, one of Wall Street’s most influential investment banks at the time. He started as a junior assistant, essentially running errands for traders on the floor, but colleagues later testified that he learned quickly and showed an unusual aptitude for cultivating relationships with wealthy clients.
By 1980, just four years after entering the firm, Epstein had risen to become a limited partner at Bear Stearns. The speed of this ascent remains one of the most baffling aspects of his story. At the time, Bear Stearns was notorious for its aggressive culture, but it was also deeply relationship-driven. A junior employee who could bring in high-net-worth clients through charm, discretion, and access could be more valuable than someone with impeccable academic credentials. Epstein appeared to thrive in this environment. His total compensation reportedly reached around $200,000 per year, a substantial sum in early 1980s dollars.
Yet his time at Bear Stearns ended abruptly. The reasons were never fully clarified, but court testimony and contemporaneous reporting point to a series of serious issues. Epstein was accused of violating securities regulations by lending money to a friend to buy stocks, an action prohibited under industry rules. He was also reportedly involved in an inappropriate workplace relationship, and he became entangled in an investigation related to insider trading at the firm. Epstein himself later testified as a witness in that case, which is how details of his compensation became public record. During that testimony, he also revealed something that surprised even seasoned observers: he had already been prosecuted in the United Kingdom for unlawful possession of an antique sword, marking his first known criminal conviction.
Despite this, Epstein did not leave Wall Street empty-handed. He retained relationships with senior figures at Bear Stearns, connections that would prove crucial years later. In his late twenties, he struck out on his own, founding a consulting firm called International Asset Group. The firm’s operations were opaque from the start. Epstein claimed to specialize in recovering stolen or embezzled assets for wealthy clients, work that could be extremely lucrative while leaving little public trace. Among his clients during this period was Adnan Khashoggi, a Saudi arms dealer and intermediary who played a central role in the Iran-Contra affair. Khashoggi himself was known for operating across jurisdictions and for holding a fake passport, adding another layer of intrigue to Epstein’s growing network.
The murkiness of Epstein’s activities only deepened in the late 1980s and early 1990s when he joined Towers Financial Corporation, a debt collection company run by Steven Hoffenberg. Publicly, Towers bought distressed debt, such as unpaid medical bills, and attempted to collect on it. In reality, it was one of the largest Ponzi schemes in American history, collapsing in 1993 with losses estimated at $450 million. Hoffenberg later went to prison. Epstein, who described himself as Hoffenberg’s protégé and served as a senior consultant earning approximately $25,000 per month, was never charged.
By this point, Epstein’s résumé included a remarkable series of red flags: dismissal from a teaching job he was unqualified for, regulatory violations at a major investment bank, proximity to insider trading investigations, involvement with a historic financial fraud, and connections to geopolitical scandals. Yet none of this appeared to impede his progress. Instead, he reinvented himself once again.
After Towers Financial collapsed, Epstein founded J. Epstein & Company, a firm that explicitly limited its clientele to individuals with a net worth of at least one billion dollars. This exclusivity was central to his mystique. He presented himself not merely as a money manager but as a confidant, strategist, and fixer, someone capable of navigating complex international tax regimes and shielding clients from scrutiny. According to later investigations, the firm had astonishingly few clients, yet it generated extraordinary revenue.
Two clients stand out above all others. The first was Leslie Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands, the parent company of Victoria’s Secret and Bath & Body Works. Wexner became Epstein’s client almost immediately after J. Epstein & Company was formed. Over the next fifteen years, Wexner paid Epstein an estimated $200 million in fees. While such sums are not unheard of in the world of ultra-high-net-worth finance, they are typically paid to firms with extensive staff, infrastructure, and documented expertise. Epstein’s firm had none of this. Even more unusual was the nature of their relationship. Epstein lived for years in a Manhattan mansion that was legally owned by Wexner, and he was granted sweeping power of attorney over Wexner’s finances.
Wexner has since said, “I deeply regret having crossed paths with Jeffrey Epstein. It was a huge mistake.” He has maintained that he was unaware of Epstein’s criminal conduct. Nevertheless, Epstein’s association with Wexner provided him with legitimacy and access that cannot be overstated. It also intersected with allegations that Epstein used his purported role as a talent scout for Victoria’s Secret to facilitate abuse, allegations that later contributed to shareholder lawsuits against L Brands, which were settled for $90 million.
The second major client was Leon Black, the co-founder and former chief executive of Apollo Global Management, one of the world’s largest private equity firms. Black’s payments to Epstein have been scrutinized intensely. According to findings reviewed by the United States Senate Finance Committee, Black paid Epstein at least $158 million between 2012 and 2017, well after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor. Black later stated that he paid Epstein for legitimate tax and estate planning services, saying, “I am ashamed and embarrassed to have had Epstein in my life.” Even so, the scale of the payments raised profound questions. Black himself was an elite financier with access to the best advisors in the world. Why he would pay tens of millions annually to Epstein remains unexplained.
Investigative reporting later revealed that Epstein’s firm also received at least $118 million in fees from other wealthy individuals and entities, including members of the Johnson & Johnson family and hedge funds such as Highbridge Capital. Forbes estimated that, based on known records, Epstein earned approximately $488 million in fees over his career. On the surface, that figure appears to explain his wealth. In reality, it does not.
Only about half of Epstein’s assets, according to his will, were invested in income-generating holdings. Several of his major investments failed spectacularly. One of the most significant was Liquid Funding, an offshore hedge fund registered in Bermuda in 2000, where Epstein served as chairman. According to documents uncovered through the Paradise Papers and analyzed by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, Liquid Funding held nearly $900 million in assets at its peak, primarily tied to complex derivatives linked to mortgage-backed securities. Bear Stearns disclosed in a 2002 report that it held approximately a 40 percent stake in the holding company that owned Liquid Funding, a striking connection given Epstein’s history with the firm.
Liquid Funding collapsed during the financial crisis, and Bear Stearns itself failed in 2008. A report by DealBook suggested that Epstein personally held a roughly 10 percent stake in the fund, implying losses in excess of $50 million. Far from being a brilliant investor, the available evidence suggests that Epstein’s market performance was mediocre at best.
Meanwhile, his expenses were enormous. He maintained multiple luxury properties, traveled frequently by private jet, employed staff in multiple jurisdictions, and retained an army of lawyers. Court records indicate that Epstein worked with more than seventy-five attorneys over the course of his life, including some of the most expensive legal talent in the country. To qualify for tax incentives in the U.S. Virgin Islands, where he based part of his operation, his firm employed at least eleven full-time staff, a figure confirmed by public audits. These overhead costs significantly eroded any income he generated.
This is where the numbers stop adding up. If Epstein earned roughly $488 million in traceable fees, lost substantial sums in failed investments, paid millions annually in expenses, and lived extravagantly, how did he still die with a fortune approaching $600 million? The discrepancy has fueled speculation about undisclosed revenue streams. That speculation intensified when the Senate Finance Committee revealed that Epstein-controlled accounts processed more than $1.9 billion in transactions through major international banks, far exceeding known income. Some of these transactions involved banks later sanctioned for ties to Russia, raising further questions about who Epstein’s clients were and what services he actually provided.
Adding to the mystery is the timing of Epstein’s will. Drafted while he was in custody and signed two days before his death, it is possible that it did not capture the full extent of his assets. Epstein had previously used fake passports and offshore structures specifically designed to obscure ownership. Investigators have acknowledged that it is entirely plausible he held assets outside the traditional financial system.
What emerges from this tangled record is not a story of financial genius but of systemic failure. Epstein exploited a global financial architecture that prioritizes secrecy, particularly in offshore jurisdictions. These structures are routinely used for tax avoidance, but they also provide cover for far more serious abuses. As one former federal prosecutor involved in related investigations put it, “The system was designed to make this kind of behavior possible, and Epstein knew exactly how to use it.”
In the end, the question of how Jeffrey Epstein got so rich may never be fully answered. The paper trail was intentionally fragmented, and many of the institutions that enabled him have been reluctant to provide transparency. What is clear, however, is that his wealth was not the product of innovation or exceptional financial insight. It was the result of access, secrecy, and a willingness to operate in the shadows, aided by a financial system that too often rewards opacity over accountability.
Comments
Post a Comment